here’s the ultra-technical tape + DOM + 4D read of what these 3 screenshots are screaming. 🧠⚡
(Everything below is microstructure logic, not “prediction”. We’re reading the auction in real time.)

0) What META_quant 4D is showing (so we speak the same language) 🧬

You’re looking at a 4D order book:

• Cyan “walls” = resting BID liquidity (passive buyers, limit orders) 🟦

• Magenta “walls” = resting ASK liquidity (passive sellers, limit orders) 🟪

• The vertical blue spine is the live price pointer slicing through the book (where the auction is happening). 🎯

• Tape/prints panel (right) gives you executed flow + side + size + “impact” stream. 🧾

• Control block (left) shows you’re running a stable microstructure lens:

  • DEPTH 200

  • SPEED 200

  • SCALE 2

  • TICKSIZE 0.1

  • TICKS SIDE 150

  • DIAM 1
    => basically “enough depth to see real walls, enough speed to scalp the reaction.” 🎛️

The key idea: Depth = intent (resting liquidity). Tape = commitment (executed liquidity).
When both agree, you get high-probability microstructure edges.

Screenshot 1 (Phase 1): New Daily Low + “Double HFT Buy Signals” ⚡⚡

1) The event: new daily low print on FDAX

You can see the book scale down to the 2524x zone (the axis shows the low area around 25243+ on the depth floor). That’s your “fresh low” context. Fresh lows matter because they attract:

• late sellers (breakdown traders),

• stops (forced sells),

• and liquidity providers hunting cheap inventory. 🧲

2) The tell: sell pressure is there… but price doesn’t accelerate lower

That’s the first smell of absorption: aggressive selling enters, but the auction fails to “continue”.

In your META_quant panel we can read:

• hb sell ~360 vs nb buy ~306 (aggressive selling is dominant)

• tot ~666 prints (busy), cum impact ~651 (high activity)

• A small negative flow metric around -15 (selling net… but not exploding)

This is classic: aggressors are selling, but they’re not getting paid with continuation.
That’s how you detect a real buyer sitting there without needing a crystal ball. 🫥🔎

3) The structure: massive bid liquidity “cliff” under price

The cyan wall on the downside is not “decorative”. It’s inventory waiting to get filled.

Now the most important nuance:
A spoof wall gets pulled when price approaches.
A real wall gets hit, filled, and often reloaded. 🧱✅

4) The “Double HFT Buy Signals” overlay

Those green markers (your system signals) are basically your microstructure confirmation layer.
In practice, a robust HFT buy trigger typically fires when several of these align:

• Aggressive sell burst slows (sell exhaustion)

• Bid replenishment rate > ask replenishment rate (MM reloading bids)

• Order book imbalance flips (OBI / depth skew tilts toward bids)

• Microprice shifts up (weighted mid drifts toward the bid side being “stronger”)

• Short-term velocity decelerates (down-move loses momentum)

So: fresh low + big real bid + seller exhaustion + signal confirmation = scalp-worthy reversal seed 🌱📈

Screenshot 2 (Phase 2): The bid wall gets hit… and it’s FILLED (real liquidity) 🧱🩸

This is the money screenshot for proving it’s not spoofing.

1) What “filled” means here (microstructure definition)

A fill is not “I saw a wall”.
A fill is: executions occur at that price level and the depth at that level actually decreases (or gets reloaded while absorbing).

Your tape/flow counters show the market working:

• hb sell ~376 (more sellers hitting bids)

• nb buy ~318

• tot ~694

• cum impact ~650

• net flow metric around -21 (selling net still present)

So sellers are still swinging… but here’s the key:

2) Absorption signature: “heavy sells, no further low”

If aggressive sells were in control, you’d see:

• the bid wall vanish and price continue to waterfall through the void.

Instead, you’re seeing:

• large resting bids getting executed (filled),

• price stabilizing,

• and often rebuilding liquidity behind (MM buyer behavior).

That’s the exact fingerprint of a buyer absorbing inventory:

sellers are providing supply, and a larger participant is happily taking the other side without letting price reprice lower.

That’s not “support”. That’s auction control. 🥷

3) Market Maker buyer behavior (what it looks like in 4D)

A MM / liquidity provider defending a level often shows up as:

• Bids persist at the same region even as they get hit

• Depth refills after partial consumption (iceberg-like behavior)

• Tape keeps printing sell-side, but the low doesn’t expand

• Spread compresses as the defense becomes confident

• Ask liquidity starts pulling once sellers fail to continue

This is why 4D is lethal: you’re not guessing who’s there.
You’re watching the defense survive contact. 🧠🟦

Screenshot 3 (Phase 3): Rebound in progress (auction acceptance higher) 🚀

Now the story transitions from “defense” to “repricing”.

1) Flow improves while activity stays elevated

Now the panel reads roughly:

• hb sell ~401

• nb buy ~338

• tot ~739

• cum impact ~652

• net flow around -14 (less negative than -21)

Even if raw sells are still high, the net pressure is improving.
That’s consistent with “seller dominance fading”.

2) HFT context shift: from “catching the knife” to “pullback-buying”

Notice the smaller parameter set displayed (you’ve got a different sensitivity block: 15 / 15 / 30 vs 45 / 45 / 90 earlier).
Translation in trader-speak:

• Early phase: you want robust filters (avoid false reversals in the flush).

• Rebound phase: you can switch to faster scalper triggers (ride micro pullbacks in a newly accepted direction). ⚙️

3) Rebound mechanics (what must happen for the bounce to be “real”)

A real bounce needs at least two of these:

• Offer pulling (magenta walls retreat above price) 🟪⬆️

• Bid ladder rebuild (cyan steps stack higher) 🟦⬆️

• Price migrates into thicker zones (acceptance, not just a wick)

• Tape flips to more lift-offer bursts on upticks

• Failed retest of the defended zone (buyers hold the line)

That’s exactly why this is perfect for scalping:
once the market accepts higher, you can scalp:

• pullbacks into rebuilt bid shelves,

• into thin ask zones,

• targeting next liquidity node as your take-profit magnet. 🧲✅

The Scalper Playbook (ultra practical, ultra microstructure) 🥷📌

A) Entry logic (high-quality)

You don’t buy “because it’s low”. You buy because:

1. New daily low prints (liquidity event)

2. Big bid wall is present (passive interest)

3. Wall gets hit and filled without continuation (absorption confirmed)

4. HFT buy signal(s) trigger (timing layer)

5. Ask side starts thinning/pulling (path opens upward)

B) Stop logic (clean)

Your invalidation is simple:

• If the defended bid zone gets fully consumed AND price accepts below (not just a tick), the absorption thesis is dead. 🧨

C) Target logic (liquidity-based)

Targets are not random R-multiples. They’re:

• next major ask wall / shelf

• next thick liquidity node

• or the first “clean air” zone completion (fast travel ends at the next wall)

Why this combo is nasty (in the best way) 😈

Because it stacks three independent “truth sources”:

1. Price event: new daily low (forced flow, stops, emotional selling)

2. Depth event: massive real bid liquidity (not pulled, it gets filled)

3. Execution event: HFT buy signals + improving net flow (timing + confirmation)

That triangle is exactly what you want for scalping reversals:
liquidity + absorption + timing.

BONZAI.PRO summary in one line 🧾🔥
Fresh daily low → real bid wall shows up → sellers slam it → wall gets FILLED (not spoofed) → HFT buy triggers → sellers exhaust → book flips → rebound scalps unlock. 😎📈

#orderflow #microstructure #market #making
#4D #data #meta_quant 🚀